Browse By

Tag Archives: Tuesday

Board#3 04/04/2018

Simple Signalling

Contract: 4S by South; West to lead. MrQ: I led AK of hearts and my partner signalled 76. We play reverse attitude so I was expecting 6 and then 7 to encourage me to lead 3 round of hearts. Explanation from East was that it

Board#2 04/04/2018

2NT with 10 Points?

Bidding: West opens 1♠ – 2NT – 3♠ – all pass MrQ: We ended up in a good contract but shouldn’t East bid 2♣ rather than 2NT (with only 10 points)? I would rebid diamonds and most likely that’s where we would end up. Makeable

Bidding#5 20/03/2018

TNT Clarified

MrQ: Was there anything we could have done here? Like maybe East supporting spades with only 3 of them? Guru: Yes, as East I would have raised to 2♠ even though I might expect South to have four of them for the double. Depends on

Board#13 20/03/2018

Game in NT or Major?

Bidding: North opens 1♣ – 1♠ – 2♦ – 3NT – all pass MrQ: Could South have bid 3♠ instead of 3NT to show 6 card spade suit, just in case there was a fit in spades? Guru: South’s 3NT bid is a terrible bid.

Board#3 20/03/2018

Too Fixated on Points

Bidding: West opens 1♥ – (X) – 2NT* – 3♦ – 3♥ – 4♥ – all pass (*Truscott) MrQ: Obviously I forgot we were playing Truscott and interpreted East’s 2NT as denying 4-card major and 11-12 points. I rebid diamonds to show 5 hearts. If

Board#10 27/03/2018

Sleepless Night

Bidding: S opens 1♥ – 1♠ – 3♥ – 3NT – 4♥ – all pass MrQ: I have not been sleeping all night because of this board especially because it was our last board of the evening and the result was miserable. I guess both

Bidding#15 13/03/2018

Another Sacrifice

MrQ: Should East raise it to 4♠ preemptively? Wouldn’t S bid to 5♦ anyway? You guys doubled 4♠, didn’t bid 5♦. Guru: Yes, East should bid 4♠ every time when West bids 3♠ and that is not necessarily preemptive since there is a TEN card

Bidding#6 13/03/2018

Just Suit Preference

MrQ: 2♥ bid just shows suit preference, might not even have support, South shouldn’t have invited even with void in spades, right? Guru: Indeed, a void in partner’s suit is usually a liability when they can only show preference for your suit. Should have been

Bidding#1 13/03/2018

(Would Be) Good Sacrifice

MrQ: Should North bid to 5♥ or South already had all the information from North showed by 2♥? South accepted 3♠ underbid to bid 4♥ to show that she is happy to bid up to 4♥. You guys bid to 5♥. Guru: Yes, 3♠ was

Bidding#18 06/03/2018

Useful Jump Shift from Responder

MrQ: I simply didn’t know how to show strength with my rebid. I guess what I should have done is jump shift (which we have not agreed with my partner on how we play it) to 2♠ on my first bid to show good 5+